外籍员工薪资报销的GST影响 | 是否属于“人力供应服务”

发布日期:
December 5, 2023

目录

联系我们
感谢您!我们已收到您的提交信息!
糟糕!提交表单时出错了。

立足本土,
服务全球

我们以专业和清晰的视角,为您提供跨境业务支持。
预约咨询

Time limit of issuance of notice for GST Assessment for FY 2017-18 lapsed on 30th September, 2023. Every industry is flooded with GST notices on various allegations including Purchase from canceled dealers, ITC reversal on exempted supplies, ITC ineligible under Section 17(5) of CGST etc. Notices are issued for FY 2017-18 till FY 2022-23.

One of the issues on which thousands of MNCs have received notice is GST on salary of foreign expats paid by foreign parent companies. GST Authorities have alleged that Indian Subsidiaries are liable to pay GST on such reimbursement considering it as “Manpower Supply services” rendered by the parent company.

This article makes a detailed discussion on applicability of GST on reimbursement of Expat salaries and what action Indian companies are required to take to avoid such liability:

1. Framework of salary payments to Foreign Expats

Employment of foreign expats works in following scenarios:

  1. 通常情况下,印度实体会与海外集团实体签订合同,以提供后台或IT支持服务。
  2. 海外实体在其所在地区维护着一个熟练员工库,并根据印度实体的要求指派员工。
  3. 这些外籍员工在印度实体的控制和指导下工作。
  4. 然而,为了维持这些员工的社会保障福利,他们的雇佣合同仍保留在外国公司名下,薪酬也由外国公司支付。
  5. 印度公司随后将外籍员工的薪酬报销给外国公司。
  6. 在某些情况下,印度公司也可能直接与外籍员工签订雇佣合同,并直接向他们支付薪酬。

2. Issue under Litigation

GST Authorities have contended that Foreign Companies are providing “Manpower Supply services” to the Indian Companies. Since, place of supply for such service lies in India and location of service provider is outside India, therefore, such supply shall tantamount to “Import of service” and Indian Companies are liable to pay GST on such services under Reverse Charge Mechanism.

GST Authorities are also content if salaries to expats are paid by Indian companies directly then GST authorities have no objection as these foreign expats are considered as employees of Indian Subsidiaries.

3. Legal Framework

Flood of Show Cause Notices on salary of foreign expats is consequent of recent judgment of Hon’ble Supreme court in the matter of M/s C.C., C.E. & S.T., Bangalore (Adjudication) Vs Northern Operating Systems Pvt. Ltd. [2022 (61) G.S.T.L. 129 (S.C)] wherein Hon'ble apex court analyzed whether the activity of secondment of employees from a foreign group company to an Indian entity amounted to manpower supply service and required Indian entities to pay GST under RCM.

Hon’ble Apex court made following analysis:

  1. “控制权”并非确定外籍员工雇主身份的唯一考量因素。此外,法院在裁决此类问题时,并没有单一的决定性因素。
  2. 在本案中,借调是外国公司将其服务临时借给印度公司的全球政策的一部分。借调期满后,外籍员工需根据全球遣返政策遣返回外国公司。此外,印度公司与外国公司之间的协议并未说明外籍员工在借调期满后将被视为印度公司的员工。
  3. 根据印度公司与外国公司签订的协议,海外公司拥有高技能员工库,这些员工被借调至印度实体以利用其技能;借调期满后,他们会返回海外雇主处,或被部署到其他借调岗位。
  4. 尽管对借调员工的工作表现拥有控制权的是印度公司,但事实仍然是,他们的海外雇主出于自身业务需要,将他们借调至印度公司。
  5. 外籍员工的薪酬由外国公司支付,且此类薪酬是根据作为雇主的海外公司的政策支付的。
  6. 因此,最高法院裁定,海外实体仍将是借调员工的雇主,而非印度实体。

4. GST Implication

Even though precedence was issued with respect to service tax law, i.e., Pre-GST regime, it will have a major impact under GST as well. Under the GST regime, if such services are considered Manpower Supply services, place of supply shall be determined in accordance with provisions of Section 13 of IGST Act.

As per Section 13 of IGST Act, “place of supply” of manpower services shall be determined as per Section 13(2), i.e, location of recipient. Location of supplier is outside India and place of supply is in India, so, cases where such service is considered as “Manpower Supply service”, such supply shall be considered as “Import of Service” and Indian company is required to pay GST under Reverse Charge Mechanism.

5. Way ahead

a. Factors to be considered to determine “Employment Contract” or “Manpower Supply Service”

Hon’ble Apex court has determined following factors which are to be considered collectively to determine who is the employer of the Foreign expats:

  1. 谁有责任向外籍员工支付薪酬?
  2. 谁有权对外国员工的工作行使控制权?
  3. 外籍员工在完成印度公司的任务后将如何安排,即他们是留在印度实体还是返回外国公司?
  4. 薪酬是根据外国公司的政策还是印度公司的政策支付的?
  5. 印度公司与外籍员工之间是否存在任何雇佣合同?
  6. 外籍员工是按“任务基础”还是“定期基础”进行分配的。

b. 现金流压力

It is pertinent to note that GST liability under RCM is required to be paid through electronic cash ledger only and can’t be paid through Electronic credit ledger. Therefore, if such service is held  as “manpower supply service” it may result in huge cash outflow for Indian companies. 

Further, Entities having accumulated ITC or excess balance in electronic credit ledger may have to face unnecessary compilation of ITC which is paid in cash only.

c. Cautionally drafting of agreement

Therefore, to escape liability under GST and avoid huge cash outflow, the only remedy is cautionally drafting of agreement between Indian Company and Foreign company as different drafting may change the tax position completely and may result in heavy taxes and penalties. 

Therefore, it is of utmost importance to get these agreements and transactions vet and incorporate the specific clause to protect the interest of both the companies and the employee.

CA Sachin Jindal
探索 CA Sachin Jindal 提供的专家见解、实用建议及最新动态
了解作者详情

最新博客